data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce7f6/ce7f6e3b20c7eeaf0d46223a71a0b6728a97bba6" alt=""
A key word and one particular word stands out in film editing terminology and that’s ‘continuity’ this is what I want to achieve as an editor. The term involves a series of shot appearing ‘physically continuous’ and by editing my footage I can make this possible.
Montage which comes from the French for ‘putting together’, this is another film editing technique similar to continuity. Lev Kuelshov (1920’s) described editing similar to making a building, “Brick by brick (shot-by-shot) the building (film) is erected”. The success of montage is down to the viewers inferring meaning based on context.
Like many media techniques there are theories around them and film editing is no different:
Edward Dmytryk- suggests a good editor should follow ‘Rules of cutting’
"Rule 1: Never make a cut without a positive reason."
"Rule 2: When undecided about the exact frame to cut on, cut long rather than short."
"Rule 3: Whenever possible cut 'in movement'."
"Rule 4: The 'fresh' is preferable to the 'stale'."
"Rule 5: All scenes should begin and end with continuing action."
"Rule 6: Cut for proper values rather than proper 'matches'."
"Rule 7: Substance first—then form."
Walter Murch- when editing there is a main criteria made of six evaluative comments to decide where to cut. I have chosen to select 3 of the 6 criteria, which I believe are relevant to my production.
Emotion (51%) -Does the cut reflect what the editor believes the audience should be feeling at that moment?
Story (23%) - Does the cut advance the story?
Rhythm (10%) - Does the cut occur "at a moment that is rhythmically interesting and 'right'"?
Excellent research into similar products and ICT techniques.
ReplyDelete